The first exclusively online law review.

Tag: JOLT Page 1 of 4

Virtual Infidelity: Is Cheating with an AI Girlfriend Considered Adultery?

Virtual Infidelity: Is Cheating with an AI Girlfriend Considered Adultery?

By: Carolyn Potts

Her, a film about a man who falls in love with a virtual assistant, was released in 2013.[1] When the movie came out, virtual affairs may have seemed like science fiction, but now, twelve years later, “virtual infidelity” has become a harsh reality for a growing number of couples. For many people, Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) is seen as a tool to answer questions or to manage tasks, but for some, it provides a sense of romantic companionship. Platforms generating AI girlfriends are experiencing a massive growth in popularity, with millions of users.[2] While most of these searches are initiated by young single men, many users engaging in relationships with AI chatbots are married to real life people.[3] The recent rise in AI love affairs begs the question, how do these virtual relationships factor in to divorce cases?

How Would Drones Piloted by A.I. Affect Our Fourth Amendment Rights?

How Would Drones Piloted by A.I. Affect Our Fourth Amendment Rights?

By: Joseph Coyle

In January 2025, drone manufacturer Red Cat announced a partnership with Palladyne AI to integrate Palladyne Pilot AI software into Red Cat’s Black Widow drones.[1] These drones are designed to be able to identify, prioritize, and track targets with little to no human direction.[2] Red Cat first unveiled the Black Widow drone in 2024.[3] These drones are already in use in the United States Military.[4] The Black Widow drone is fitted with a GPS system, camera, electro-optical sensors, infrared sensors, and has a flight time of over forty-five minutes.[5]

Labubu vs. Lafufu: Pop Mart’s Battle for IP Protection and the Tech Behind Authenticity Verification

Labubu vs. Lafufu: Pop Mart’s Battle for IP Protection and the Tech Behind Authenticity Verification

By: Anneliese McInnis

Labubus, the grinning, wide-eyed plush dolls, have grown exponentially in popularity among young Americans, capturing their hearts and wallets. The collectible doll generally retails for $20 to $30, but rarer figures sell for thousands; the most expensive Labubu sold for $150,000 at an auction in Beijing.[1] Pop Mart has capitalized on their popularity by introducing the viral “blind-box” model that fuels suspense in customers eager to find out which Labubu doll they will unwrap.[2] This unique model, however, has made the company susceptible to counterfeit products on the market copying the plush dolls’ distinct features.[3]

You Got a Snap! How Snapchat Became a Child Predator’s Playground and How AI Can Help

You Got a Snap! How Snapchat Became a Child Predator’s Playground and How AI Can Help

By: Jessica Huynh

Since its launch in September 2011, Snapchat has skyrocketed to dominance as a leading social media platform.[1] Currently, Snapchat has 453 million daily users worldwide, with U.S. teenagers ranking it the second most important social media network of their generation.[2] The app allows users to share photos, videos, and messages known as “snaps” with friends.[3] What differentiates Snapchat from other social media platforms is its unique feature that makes snaps disappear after the recipient opens the snap.[4] Snapchat transformed social media by redefining message deletion, turning it from a drawback into a key feature.[5] While this key feature has allowed for more candid conversations, it has also presented new dangers: the increased creation and distribution of child pornography.

The Genius Act and The Rise of Federally Regulated Cryptocurrency

The Genius Act and The Rise of Federally Regulated Cryptocurrency

By: Kira Johnson

I.           Overview

On July 18, 2025, President Trump signed the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act, known as the GENIUS Act (the “Act”), into law.[1] Now, federal and state regulators are tasked with creating the rulemaking necessary to implement the Act, including capital requirements and risk management policies.[2] The GENIUS Act will become effective on the earlier of two dates: (1) eighteen months after the date of enactment or (2) 120 days after a primary federal payment stablecoin regulator issues final implementing regulations.[3]

Gifford v. Sheil: Can an Influencer Own an Aesthetic?

Gifford v. Sheil: Can an Influencer Own an Aesthetic?

By: Shoham Lewin

As an increasing number of companies use social media influencers as part of their marketing strategy, the influencer industry is valued at approximately $250 billion.[1] Within this multi-billion dollar industry, influencers compete for lucrative brand deals, each using their aesthetic to distinguish themselves.[2] A recent case out of Texas has raised the question of whether these creators legally own their social media aesthetic and, consequently, whether they can utilize intellectual property law to stop other creators from using that same aesthetic.[3]

Robo-Lawyers: Is The Legal Profession at Risk?

Robo-Lawyers: Is The Legal Profession at Risk?

By: Coles Owens

Artificial intelligence (“AI”) is increasingly being used in the legal field, and many seem to be asking the same question: Will AI mark the beginning of the end for attorneys as we know them?[1]

On one hand, AI can increase efficiency and improve the quality of work produced[2] while reducing attorneys’ workloads, costs of litigation, and hours.[3] AI tools speed up the processes of recording and analyzing information provided by clients, contract analysis, document summarization, and case research.[4] AI is also being used to inform bail and sentencing decisions by judges.[5] Lawyers being able to complete tasks faster by using AI may drive the price of legal services down, making them more accessible and affordable.[6] This multitude of benefits has led to 79% of law firms surveyed by Barone Defense Firm reporting use of some form of AI technology in their work.[7]

Digital Inheritance and Entertainment Media: Can We Pass Down Our Digital Collections When We Die?

Digital Inheritance and Entertainment Media: Can We Pass Down Our Digital Collections When We Die?

By: Garrett Schneider

The Internet became available to the public in April 1993, and has fundamentally changed how we think about media access, consumption, and ownership. Especially in recent years, the shift from physical media to digital has become ever more drastic – since 2018, streaming subscriptions have grown from 55% of home media sales to 88% by 2023.[1] Physical media sales sit at just 3% of total sales.[2] While the convenience of streaming and digital media is unquestionable, its ubiquity presents a question as to how we build our media collections, and who owns them when we no longer can.

TikTok Bans and National Security: Can the U.S. Actually Ban an App?

TikTok Bans and National Security: Can the U.S. Actually Ban an App?

By: Camila Sidiqi

Just when we thought the fear of losing TikTok was behind us, here we are again, facing that same uncertainty. With a September 17th deadline looming, ByteDance has been ordered to sell TikTok to an American company or risk being banned in the U.S.[1] The clock is ticking, and while some dismiss this as another political stunt, others are wondering: Can the government really do this? Does this not violate my First Amendment rights? If you are asking those questions, you are not alone—I have been thinking the same thing. So let me break it down: does the U.S. government actually have the power to ban an app, and what does this mean for the future of digital platforms?

 

Page 1 of 4

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén