The first exclusively online law review.

Author: Nicholas Guy

Prediction Markets Come in From the Cold

Prediction Markets Come in From the Cold

By: Sabeeka Khan

Imagine a market where you can trade on whether a popular video game releases before December 2026, whether a CEO mentions “growth” on an earnings call, or whether the Supreme Court makes a particular ruling. Prices move up and down based on the collective beliefs about future events and a “share” priced at ten cents today promises one dollar if the event happens by the deadline. This is a new reality. Prediction markets operate just like stock markets, instead of betting on the financial growth of companies like Apple or Amazon, participants bet on the likelihood of real-world events.[1]

Trademarks For Your Online Business: Are You Conducting Interstate Commerce?

Trademarks For Your Online Business: Are You Conducting Interstate Commerce?

By: Skylar Shafer

Under the Lanham Act, to register a trademark and receive protection under federal law, a mark must be used in or actively affect interstate commerce.[1] For traditional cases of physical commerce, the interstate commerce test has been refined over centuries.[2] This interstate component as a means of getting access to federal loss is not new, and is instead based on the Commerce Clause.[3] But what about when that commerce is over the internet? How do we determine if it is interstate commerce? How can a business-owner know if they can register their trademark or not? Let’s get into it.

Untangling the Grid: Navigating Legal Barriers for Intelligent Energy Solutions That Are Sustainable

Untangling the Grid: Navigating Legal Barriers for Intelligent Energy Solutions That Are Sustainable

By: Rachel Thury

The 21st century brings with it an ever-growing need for sustainable energy systems that can endure modern challenges. Energy grids from the past are now struggling because they were constructed to support centralized fossil fuel power plants which no longer meet today’s demands. These traditional systems were not designed to handle the decentralized, dynamic flows of renewable energy, nor to adapt to increasingly digital energy demands.[1]

When Protecting Your Patent Goes Wrong – Strava v. Garmin. By: Theresa Small

When Protecting Your Patent Goes Wrong – Strava v. Garmin.

By: Theresa Small

Most endurance athletes have heard of the titan of the GPS tracking industry – Garmin. Garmin was founded in 1989 by two electrical engineers and since then they have risen to not only global prominence but dominance.[1] Their watches range anywhere from a few hundred (the average being around four hundred) to two thousand dollars.[2] A good GPS watch is an endurance athletes best friend, from tracking heart rate, to sleep, workouts, calories burned, stress on the body. Garmin even recommends workouts for you based on the data it has collected.[3]

Smart Doorbells and the Legality of the Audio Recording Feature

Smart Doorbells and the Legality of the Audio Recording Feature

By: Reese Bell

There has been much fear—and fear-mongering—surrounding the use of mass-surveillance across the U.S., and who exactly may have access to recordings collected by such surveillance. At the center of much of this discussion is an increasingly popular device known as a smart doorbell, frequently associated with the Amazon-subsidiary brand, Ring. The Ring doorbell is a camera and audio system, often placed on the front doors of residential buildings.[1] Ring doorbells provide users with video and audio recordings of activity around their front door, most often for the purpose of increasing the security and protection of their homes.[2] While video recordings capturing the goings-on of a smart doorbell-user’s front yard and adjacent public space is of little legal concern in most states, the audio feature included with these devices has sparked significant legal controversy.

The Coldplay Couple: A Cautionary Tale

The Coldplay Couple: A Cautionary Tale

By: Karina Chatha

This past summer, the world was locked in the drama of internet strangers with the “Coldplay Couple”. The incident occurred over a KissCam at a Coldplay concert, where the camera caught a man and a woman in an embrace.[1] However, once they realized they were on camera, they ducked and hid their faces, leading Chris Martin, Coldplay’s singer, to quip “either they’re having an affair or they’re very shy.”[2] Someone in the crowd recorded the KissCam on the Jumbotron and uploaded the video to the popular video-sharing platform, TikTok.

Born to Die: Planned Obsolescence and the Lack of Legal Recourse

Born to Die: Planned Obsolescence and the Lack of Legal Recourse

By: Elena Overstreet

In 2024, technology was the largest category of consumer spending during the holiday season, and it was projected that the 2025 holiday season would be the same.[1] Spending in this area seems to increase each year, with people finding the latest phones, kindles, and Oura Rings under their Christmas trees.[2] The thrill of new devices does not come without a cost, however. By 2030, the annual volume of electronics placed on the market is estimated to have risen to 120 billion kilograms – approximately 264 billion pounds.  While some progress has been made in collecting and recycling the materials used, this progress barely makes a dent in the magnitude of electronic waste being generated.[4] Yet, the trouble does not stop there.

U.S. Business Practices Oppose Effective Crackdown on “Spoofing” Scams

U.S. Business Practices Oppose Effective Crackdown on “Spoofing” Scams

By: Ian Lipka

 

In 2020, Indian national Hitesh Madhubhai Patel was sentenced to twenty years in prison and almost $9 million in restitution for crimes relating to online and telephone scams he owned and organized.[1] Patel funded and ran India-based call centers that defrauded U.S. victims out of somewhere between $25 million and $65 million from 2013-2016.[2] While Patel’s conviction was certainly a victory for the Justice Department, the issue of online and telephone scams has dramatically increased since Patel’s sentencing five years ago. The Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) concluded that U.S. victims lost $16.6 billion in 2024 from online and telephone scams—compared to just shy of $4 billion in 2020.

Citizens are fraudulently deprived of their money now more than ever. And while criminal prosecutions are effective in their own right, the international nature of these scams makes it extremely difficult for countries to stifle them.[4] Most scammers operate overseas and are therefore often beyond the jurisdiction of the victim nation.[5]

Almost four out of every five adults in the U.S. view online/telephone attacks as a major national problem.[6] Countermeasures are needed, but solving the issue of international scamming is not so simple. The problem may be better addressed by tackling the contributing smaller issues gradually. One such issue primed for change is known as “spoofing.”

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén