Richmond Journal of Law and Technology

The first exclusively online law review.

Tag: Richmond JOLT Page 1 of 2

International Crackdown on the Illegal Streaming of Sporting Events

By

On November 12, 2025

In Blog Posts

International Crackdown on the Illegal Streaming of Sporting Events

By: Jack Brestel

What Happened?

Streameast, the world’s largest illegal sports streaming platform, was shut down September 3, 2025 by the Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment (ACE), a global antipiracy group.[1] The website had 80 domains and received over 1.6 billion visits in the last year.[2] Streameast provided access to NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB, boxing, MMA, motorsports, and various professional soccer matches.[3] ACE is a coalition of over 50 global media and entertainment organizations, including Amazon, Apple TV+, Netflix, and Paramount, that operate alongside law enforcement, including Europol and the U.S. Department of Justice, to reduce online piracy of copyrighted material.[4] In this case, two men in Egypt were arrested on suspicion of copyright infringement with authorities seizing laptops and smartphones believed to have helped operate the piracy websites as well as links to a shell company in the United Arab Emirates that allegedly conspired to launder over 6 million dollars.[5]

Read More

Smart Contracts: What are they, and how do they integrate into contract law and a business’s toolkit?

By

On November 12, 2025

In Blog Posts

Smart Contracts: What are they, and how do they integrate into contract law and a business’s toolkit?

By: Skylar Shafer

The legal world is coming to terms with a digital revolution, with several key advancements in areas such as transformers for language models (ChatGPT) and blockchain (cybersecurity and cryptocurrency). One byproduct of these advancements has been the introduction of smart contracts, particularly correlated with the introduction of blockchain. Smart contracts are self-executing pieces of software that automatically and autonomously implement contractual terms on a peer-to-peer and immutable basis, when certain conditions are met.[1] To simplify this definition, smart contracts are fully digital contracts, secured through blockchain technology, that automatically enact clauses of a contract based on digital inputs. For example, a smart contract could verify the transit of goods from one place to another using digital inputs such as GPS or official online documents, and then automatically making payment and fulfilling a contract based on the completion of those conditions. [2]

Read More

U.S. Business Practices Oppose Effective Crackdown on “Spoofing” Scams

By

On November 10, 2025

In Blog Posts

U.S. Business Practices Oppose Effective Crackdown on “Spoofing” Scams

By: Ian Lipka

 

In 2020, Indian national Hitesh Madhubhai Patel was sentenced to twenty years in prison and almost $9 million in restitution for crimes relating to online and telephone scams he owned and organized.[1] Patel funded and ran India-based call centers that defrauded U.S. victims out of somewhere between $25 million and $65 million from 2013-2016.[2] While Patel’s conviction was certainly a victory for the Justice Department, the issue of online and telephone scams has dramatically increased since Patel’s sentencing five years ago. The Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) concluded that U.S. victims lost $16.6 billion in 2024 from online and telephone scams—compared to just shy of $4 billion in 2020.

Citizens are fraudulently deprived of their money now more than ever. And while criminal prosecutions are effective in their own right, the international nature of these scams makes it extremely difficult for countries to stifle them.[4] Most scammers operate overseas and are therefore often beyond the jurisdiction of the victim nation.[5]

Almost four out of every five adults in the U.S. view online/telephone attacks as a major national problem.[6] Countermeasures are needed, but solving the issue of international scamming is not so simple. The problem may be better addressed by tackling the contributing smaller issues gradually. One such issue primed for change is known as “spoofing.”

Read More

You Got a Snap! How Snapchat Became a Child Predator’s Playground and How AI Can Help

By

On October 8, 2025

In Blog Posts

You Got a Snap! How Snapchat Became a Child Predator’s Playground and How AI Can Help

By: Jessica Huynh

Since its launch in September 2011, Snapchat has skyrocketed to dominance as a leading social media platform.[1] Currently, Snapchat has 453 million daily users worldwide, with U.S. teenagers ranking it the second most important social media network of their generation.[2] The app allows users to share photos, videos, and messages known as “snaps” with friends.[3] What differentiates Snapchat from other social media platforms is its unique feature that makes snaps disappear after the recipient opens the snap.[4] Snapchat transformed social media by redefining message deletion, turning it from a drawback into a key feature.[5] While this key feature has allowed for more candid conversations, it has also presented new dangers: the increased creation and distribution of child pornography.

Read More

The Genius Act and The Rise of Federally Regulated Cryptocurrency

By

On October 6, 2025

In Blog Posts

The Genius Act and The Rise of Federally Regulated Cryptocurrency

By: Kira Johnson

I.           Overview

On July 18, 2025, President Trump signed the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act, known as the GENIUS Act (the “Act”), into law.[1] Now, federal and state regulators are tasked with creating the rulemaking necessary to implement the Act, including capital requirements and risk management policies.[2] The GENIUS Act will become effective on the earlier of two dates: (1) eighteen months after the date of enactment or (2) 120 days after a primary federal payment stablecoin regulator issues final implementing regulations.[3]

Read More

Gifford v. Sheil: Can an Influencer Own an Aesthetic?

By

On September 28, 2025

In Blog Posts

Gifford v. Sheil: Can an Influencer Own an Aesthetic?

By: Shoham Lewin

As an increasing number of companies use social media influencers as part of their marketing strategy, the influencer industry is valued at approximately $250 billion.[1] Within this multi-billion dollar industry, influencers compete for lucrative brand deals, each using their aesthetic to distinguish themselves.[2] A recent case out of Texas has raised the question of whether these creators legally own their social media aesthetic and, consequently, whether they can utilize intellectual property law to stop other creators from using that same aesthetic.[3]

Read More

Robo-Lawyers: Is The Legal Profession at Risk?

By

On September 23, 2025

In Blog Posts

Robo-Lawyers: Is The Legal Profession at Risk?

By: Coles Owens

Artificial intelligence (“AI”) is increasingly being used in the legal field, and many seem to be asking the same question: Will AI mark the beginning of the end for attorneys as we know them?[1]

On one hand, AI can increase efficiency and improve the quality of work produced[2] while reducing attorneys’ workloads, costs of litigation, and hours.[3] AI tools speed up the processes of recording and analyzing information provided by clients, contract analysis, document summarization, and case research.[4] AI is also being used to inform bail and sentencing decisions by judges.[5] Lawyers being able to complete tasks faster by using AI may drive the price of legal services down, making them more accessible and affordable.[6] This multitude of benefits has led to 79% of law firms surveyed by Barone Defense Firm reporting use of some form of AI technology in their work.[7]

Read More

TikTok Bans and National Security: Can the U.S. Actually Ban an App?

By

On September 11, 2025

In Blog Posts

TikTok Bans and National Security: Can the U.S. Actually Ban an App?

By: Camila Sidiqi

Just when we thought the fear of losing TikTok was behind us, here we are again, facing that same uncertainty. With a September 17th deadline looming, ByteDance has been ordered to sell TikTok to an American company or risk being banned in the U.S.[1] The clock is ticking, and while some dismiss this as another political stunt, others are wondering: Can the government really do this? Does this not violate my First Amendment rights? If you are asking those questions, you are not alone—I have been thinking the same thing. So let me break it down: does the U.S. government actually have the power to ban an app, and what does this mean for the future of digital platforms?

 

Read More

Sweet Deal or Sweet Scam? How Honey is Allegedly Hurting Content Creators’ Commissions

By

On March 7, 2025

In Blog Posts

Sweet Deal or Sweet Scam? How Honey is Allegedly Hurting Content Creators’ Commissions

By: Anneliese McInniscoiny-paypal-1-dragged-e1684957590871.jpg

About 17 million consumers have downloaded Honey, PayPal’s free browser extension that finds the “best” deals and coupons to help you save money.[1] However, under Honey’s sweet facade lies an alleged commission-poaching scheme that has harmed content creators, influencers, and bloggers who earn revenue from online-shoppers using their affiliate links.[2]

Many content creators earn commission through product promotion and rely on affiliate marketing to generate revenue.[3] Affiliates earn commission by generating sales from consumers who use the affiliate’s assigned link.[4] Affiliates get credit for referring customers through tracking technology, which most people know as cookies.[5] “When a consumer clicks on an affiliate link, a cookie is placed in their browser. If that consumer makes a purchase, the affiliate responsible for the last-clicked link earns a commission.”[6] This model is called “last-click attribution.”[7]

Read More

Page 1 of 2

Next

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén