[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”3.22″ custom_padding=”54px|0px|0|0px|false|false”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”3.25″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” custom_padding=”27px|0px|0|0px|false|false”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”3.25″ custom_padding=”|||” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.4.4″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” hover_enabled=”0″]

Volume XVII (2010-2011)

Issue 3 – Annual Survey: Spring 2011

Introduction: contains Cover, Table of Contents, Letter from the Editor, and Masthead 


8.   Federal Rule of Evidence 502: Has It Lived Up to Its Potential? — Hon. Paul W. Grimm, Lisa Yurwit Bergstrom & Matthew P. Kraeuter

9.   Law in the Age of Exabytes: Some further Thoughts on ‘Information Inflation’ and Current Issues in E-Discovery Search — Jason R. Baron

10.   Four Years Later: How the 2006 Amendments to the Federal Rules Have Reshaped the E-Discovery Landscape and are Revitalizing the Civil Justice System — Bennett B. Borden, Monica McCarroll, Brian C. Vick & Lauren M. Wheeling

11.   Technology-Assisted Review in E-Discovery Can Be More Effective and More Efficient Than Exhaustive Manual Review — Maura R. Grossman & Gordon V. Cormack

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_divider _builder_version=”3.11″][/et_pb_divider][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]